United Kingdom

Drone aircraft and illegal missiles uncovered by Weapons Inspectors fail to contribute to a body of evidence establishing reasonable doubt that Iraq is not currently engaged in secretly preparing an arsenal of deadly chemical agents.

Can someone explain to me why the United States of America is on trial in the current United Nations Judicial proceedings concerning possible war in Iraq. I simply do not understand how blatantly obvious glaring facts seem to be overlooked in the United Nations Judicial proceedings concerning a possible war in Iraq. The United States is currently being raked over hot coals in the United Nations Judicial Proceedings.

As I remember, Iraq President Saddam Hussein once claimed the United Nations is dominated, controlled by, and exist as a puppet of the all-powerful United States superpower. On the contrary, recent United Nations deliberations seem to demonstrate that Iraq is in control of the United Nations.

Iraq has engaged in a pattern of military aggression in the Middle East that eventually lead to an United Nations legal provision for weapons inspections to disarm Iraq. Iraq has the burden of providing prove that Iraq is in full compliance with United Nations provisions lawfully mandated by the United Nations in the 1990’s to insure full and compete military disarmament of Iraq.

In the 1990’s weapons inspections failed and the U.N. weapons inspection team was cast out of Iraq. The most recent effort to reestablish the United Nations Weapons Inspection process has lead to the discovery of illegal missiles and drone aircraft capable of carrying lethal biological agents.

Iraq must establish reasonable doubt that it is not currently manufacturing lethal deadly chemical agents to be used in a military attack of its Middle East neighbors. Drone aircraft and illegal missiles uncovered by Weapons Inspectors fail to contribute to a body of evidence establishing reasonable doubt that Iraq is not currently engaged in secretly preparing an arsenal of deadly chemical agents. Iraq’s possession of illegal weapons does not help Iraq establish reasonable doubt of future aggressive Middle East military actions.

I feel sorry for the United Nations Inspection Team lead by Hans Blix. The weapons inspections team lead by Hans Blix is in the hot seat. The lives of millions of innocent people rest in the hands of the United Nations Inspection Team lead by Hans Blix.

In my freelance feature article entitled, Oil Producing Nations Should Want Greater Stability in the Middle East, I discuss a new class of scientific instrumentation that Iraq may soon acquire. The following is a highly relevant excerpt:

Scanning Probe Microscopes (STM) are a new class of scientific instrumentation that allow scientist to manipulate and reconfigure molecular bonds in the molecular arrangement of a chemical compounds. Laboratory processes that use to require an entire fully equipped laboratory filled with big bulky laboratory equipment can now be performed with a computer chip.

The new class of scientific instrumentation can make laboratories that produce deadly chemical agents more mobile. The new class of scientific instrumentation may make the job of weapons inspectors, either now or in the near future, a virtually impossible task.

The United Nations Inspection Team should also consider that, in addition to making laboratories more mobile, a new class of scientific instrumentation may dramatically speed up rate of manufacture of lethal chemical agents. Eventually, Iraq may be able to produce gallons of the deadly chemical by the minute.

Bookmark this page now, than click here to read the freelance feature article entitled, Oil Producing Nations Should Want Greater Stability in the Middle East, currently available on www.ideamarketers.com.

What will happen when an Ultra Conservative Religious State that feels increasingly isolated from the rest of the developing world acquires new scientific instrumentation that allows the isolated nation to dramatically step up production of deadly chemical agents is something to ponder. Hence, my peace plan provides for a provision for special high level government commission to insure protection of ultra conservative religious states from negative effects of democratization. An assurance of protection from negative effects of lax permissive democratization upon Ultra Conservative Religious States may prevent Ultra Conservative Religious States, like Iraq, from becoming isolated due to feeling pitted against the developing world.

The CBS News Broadcast 60 Minutes aired an episode about how the old Soviet Union during the height of the Cold War constructed a special nuclear weapons manufacturing facility hidden inside a mountain that produced an atomic bomb every hour. The nuclear bomb manufacturing facility was so automated that bomb production processes could not be stopped at the end of the Cold War.

Eventually, the old Soviet Union asked for technical help from the United States to safely dismantle the nuclear bomb manufacturing facility. Today, Russia and the United States works as a team on the space laboratory.

Perhaps, the United States is being raked over the hot coals in current United Nations diplomacy because of a perception of unnecessary meddling in Middle East affairs. The United States may be perceived as interfering in political affairs of the Middle East.

Obviously, United States lawmakers have made severe diplomatic mistakes in Middle East diplomatic affairs. The diplomatic mistakes that U.S. lawmakers have made in the Middle East region is in large measure due to the specific forms of government in the region.

Why does the United States feel it has the right to intervene in affairs of the Middle East? The Middle East region and the United States have a business relationship characterized by mutually supported interdependency. As customers who purchase large volumes of Middle East Oil, the United States spends vast sums of money in the Middle East.

It is widely recognized that large sums of money can lead to corruption. Lawmakers may feel a need to insure that the spending power exercised in the Middle East is not abused to jeopardize and endanger Middle East citizenship. U.S. lawmakers may feel a moral imperative to insure that vast sums of money spent in the Middle East is not used to compromise the lives of innocent citizens.

The politics of the Middle East region is very complicated. Government of the Middle East primarily exist as Ultra Conservative Religious Monarchies. Ultra Conservative Religious Monarchies do not provide an adequate system to allow transition of governmental authority and power when an Ultra Conservative Ruling Monarchy must be replaced for some natural reason.

Often, because a system providing for an ordered transition of government is not in place, vying political factions seeking governmental rule attempt to take control by forceful methods. In the case of Iraq, the United States helped Iraq President Saddam Hussein capture the thrown of Iraq. Obviously, United States lawmakers made a mistake and back the wrong horse.

Lawmakers in the United States are human. Lawmakers in the United States make human mistakes. Despite advanced scientific data gathering technique, lawmakers still do not have the power to predict the future with 100 percent accuracy. The power to predict the future with 100 percent accuracy is still reserved for an all-knowing Omnipotent God or Allah.

Free democratic societies are not perfect. At some point, the goals of Ultra Conservative Religious States and free democratic societies merge. My feature article entitled, Commitment to Protect Muslim Ultra Conservative Values of Iraqi People, provides a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of Ultra Conservative Religious States versus Free Democratic Societies.

Bookmark this page now, than click here to read the feature article entitled, Commitment to Protect Ultra Conservative Values of Iraqi People, currently posed on www.ideamarketers.com.

The degree that Ultra Conservative Religious States and free democratic societies share common goals is debatable. A special high level government commission can study how to protect Ultra Conservative Religious States from the negative aspects of democratization. High level government commissions can be used as a tool for peace.

My understanding is that even while Osma Bin Laden fought to repel a communist invasion of Afghanistan with military help of the United States, Osma Bin Laden clung to hatred of the lax permissive free democratic government of the United States. It is unfortunate Osma Bin Laden did not recognize diplomatic methods to protect Ultra Conservative Religious Muslim States of the Middle East from negative effects of lax permissive democratization.

About the Author

Author byline and Bio: Mark Gaffney is a contributing freelance writer. Mark has earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Psychology with a concentration of coursework in physiology, biology, and computer science. Mark is in the process of trying to start a new Not-for-Profit Foundation entitled, Wonderful Life Foundation. Mark plans to submit his online work as a thesis project to earn his Doctorate (PhD.) degree and officially become a Nanotechnology Sociologist. Bookmark this page now and click here to review preliminary plans for organizational development of Wonderful Life Foundation currently published on www.ServeNet.org. ServeNet.org, Idealist.org, and Network-for-Good.org are associated with the government web site portal, www.freedomcorp.gov, an initiative of President George W. Bush to promote volunteerism and provide services to help Not-for-Profit organizations.